Cut Eka Utari

Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, INSTIPER Yogyakarta

*Ismiasih

*Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, INSTIPER Yogyakarta

Siwi Istiana Dinarti

Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, INSTIPER Yogyakarta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jsep.v18i3.47174 

ABSTRACT 

Increasing agricultural productivity is a strategic issue in economic development. As a concrete effort, the government introduced the IP Padi 400 superior variety program. This study aims to: (1) analyze rice farm productivity in Trimulyo Village, Jetis District, Bantul Regency, before and after the implementation of the program, and (2) assess the impact of the IP Padi 400 program on productivity. The study used a quantitative descriptive method with purposive sampling to select farmer respondents who used the program. The data were analyzed using a difference test (t-test) to measure the significance of the difference in productivity. The results of the study showed a counterintuitive phenomenon. Agricultural productivity actually experienced a sharp decline, from an average of 0.56 kg/m2 before the program to only 0.11 kg/m2 after the IP Padi 400 program was implemented. This decline is strongly suspected to be caused by continuous planting practices (monoculture) on the same land, which triggered an increase in pest and disease attacks. Statistical analysis confirmed that the decline was significant, meaning that there was a real difference between the conditions before and after the program intervention. These findings indicate that the effectiveness of the superior variety introduction program needs to be supported by proper cultivation and pest management guidelines in order to achieve the goal of sustainable productivity improvement.

Keywords: impact, IP 400 program, farming, rice, productivity.

REFERENCES

[1] Ade, S. (2012). Meningkatkan Indeks Pertanaman PADI Sawah Menuju IP Padi 400 Increasing Rice Cropping Index to Cropping Index of 400 Oleh : Ade Supriatna Balai Besar Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian . Alamat korespondensi : Ade Supriatna ( ade_supriatnas@y. Agrin, 16(1), 1–18.

[2] Aditya, G., Syafruddin, S., & Anggra, A. (2024). Tingkat Pengetahuan Petani dalam Pengendalian Hama dan Penyakit Tanaman Kakao di Kecamatan Masamba Luwu Utara. Jurnal Ilmiah Membangun Desa Dan Pertanian, 9(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.37149/jimdp.v9i1.835

[3] Ayub, A., Noorachmat, B. P., & Yanuar Jarwadi Purwanto, M. (2021). Analisis Alih Fungsi Lahan Sawah Dan Keterkaitanya Dengan Nilai Tukar Petani (Ntp) Di Kabupaten Bantul. Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa Pertanian Dan Biosistem, 9(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.29303/jrpb.v9i1.215

[4] Dalimunthe, I. M., & Kurnia, G. (2018). Prospek Penerapan Sistem Corporate Farming (Studi Kasus di Koperasi Pertanian Gerbang Emas). Jurnal AGRISEP, 17(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.17.1.11-22

[5] Daruwaskita. (2022). Program IP 400, Bantul Siapkan 5 Ribu Hektare Lahan.

[6] Echo, P. (2022). Pemerintah Gaungkan Panen 4 Kali Lewat Program IP 400. FPP Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi Fakultas Pertanian Dan Peternakan.

[7] Herdiansah Sujaya, D., Hardiyanto, T., & Yuniawan Isyanto, A. (2018). Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Produktivitas Usahatani Mina Padi Di Kota Tasikmalaya . MIMBAR AGRIBISNIS: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis, 4(1), 25–39.

[8] Hidayat, S., & Minarsih, S. (2023). Sikap Petani Terhadap Program Padi IP 400 di Kabupaten Cilacap. Jurnal Suluh Tani, 1(1), 7–13.

[9] Indraningsih, K. S. (2018). Strategi Diseminasi Inovasi Pertanian dalam Mendukung Pembangunan Pertanian. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 35(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v35n2.2017.107-123

[10] Ismiasih, I., Dinarti, S. I., & Adnanti, M. W. (2022). Peran Kelompok Tani Dan Anggota Pada Penerapan Inovasi Teknologi Pertanian Di Desa Trimulyo. Agritech: Jurnal Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, 24(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.30595/agritech.v24i1.12332

[11] Ismiasih, I., Dinarti, S. I., & Afroda, H. (2024). Institutional Synergy in Diffusion and Adoption of Agricultural Technology in Farming Communities in Bantul District, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 16(3), 301. https://doi.org/10.19184/jsep.v16i3.43044

[12] Muhajirin, Damayanti, Y., & Elwamendri. (2014). Alumni Jurusan Agribisnis Program Studi Agribisnis Fakultas Pertanian Unja 2) Staf Pengajar Jurusan Agribisnis Fakultas Pertanian Unja. Sosio Ekonomika Bisnis, 17(1), 82–91.

[13] Nuryanti, S., & Swastika, D. K. S. (2016). Peran Kelompok Tani dalam Penerapan Teknologi Pertanian. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 29(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v29n2.2011.115-128

[14] Subagyo. (2022). IP 400 terobosan mendongkrak produksi padi nasional. AntaraNews.

[15] Sudana, W. (2010). POLA PENELITIAN VS POLA TANAM PETANI Response to IP Padi 400 Policy : The Improved vs the Existing Cropping Patterns. 103–117.

[16] Sudarmaji, S., & Herawati, N. ’Aini. (2017). Perkembangan Populasi Tikus Sawah Pada Lahan Sawah Irigasi Dalam Pola Indeks Pertanaman Padi 300. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan, 1(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.21082/jpptp.v1n2.2017.p125-131

[17] Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. ALFabeta.

[18] Suratiyah, K. (2015). Ilmu Usaha Tani. Penebar Swadaya.